Cherry Studio vs LobeHub for MCP servers
Cherry Studio and LobeHub differ in 7 of 10 facts: publisher, kind, runs on, price, licence, connects to, headers for remote servers.
| Fact | Cherry Studio | LobeHub |
|---|---|---|
| Publisher | CherryHQ | LobeHub |
| Kind | Desktop app | Web app, Desktop app |
| Runs on | macOS, Windows, Linux | Web |
| Price | Free | Free plan |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | Not stated |
| Connects to | Local (stdio), Remote (HTTP), Remote (SSE) | Local (stdio), Remote (HTTP) |
| Headers for remote servers | No | Yes |
| Server config | No config we write | No config we write |
| Servers that work in it | No config we write | No config we write |
| What we checked | Matches the official docs | Matches the official docs |
| Add a server | In Cherry Studio | In LobeHub |
From each client's own documentation and site, as linked on its page. The server counts are today's install configs that work in each.